Guns - Personal Responsibility - Shall Not Be Infringed
November 1, 2019 | View PDF
While the gun control debate escalates after mass shootings, I want to begin this article with a few simple questions that might deserve simple answers. Does a Saturday night special or an AK-47 on the counter kill innocent people? Does a spoon or fork cause obesity? Does a bottle of whisky or a six-pack of beer in the store cause a DUI? Does a needle filled with heroin cause drug addiction? Did a Boeing 757 become a weapon of mass destruction (WMD) killing innocent people at the World Trade Center? Does a rope hanging in a tree cause suicide? Does a butter knife or meat cleaver become an assault weapon and create a hate crime? Did my pencil cause me to fail the test at school? The answer to all these questions is, ABSOLUTELY NOT! In the wake of a horrific crime, where innocent lives have been senselessly taken, it is the time for cool heads and common sense to prevail.
What ever happened to personal responsibility? I am indeed responsible for my own actions. If I break the law, I am the problem and should be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. My children, at one time, attended a school notarized for providing a classical education. One of the hallmarks of this academic setting was the school had a governing constitution, each classroom had a constitution and every student had a personal constitution. The idea was to be self-governed. If our children obeyed all three of these constitutions, they are self-governed, and guess what, no laws were broken. Friends, this is the genesis for a law-abiding community, state and nation. The problem is those people who are not self-governed. They break the law, hurt others in the process and unfortunately the punitive consequences do not match the crime. No personal responsibility, translates into breaking the law.
Our founding fathers where brilliant countrymen, who knew that government had the potential power to over reach into the affairs of man. They were successful in getting the ten amendments (Bill of Rights) ratified by the people in 1791. One of these constitutionally protected rights was the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which states: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Infringed means an act to limit, undermine or encroach and tyrannical means dictatorial, oppressive or authoritarian. It is an unequivocal right for U.S. citizens to own and bear arms. This issue is one of so many serving as a prime example why we need constitutional originalist on the federal bench.
2020 Democrat Presidential hopefuls are hyping up talk about gun control, but they have three serious problems. The first problem is any legislation passed by congress, with the exception of a constitutional amendment ratified by the people should be struck down by the federal courts as unconstitutional. Constitutional provisions can be addressed by passing an amendment to the U.S. Constitution; it has to clear the U.S. House and Senate by two-thirds of the majority voting and then ratified by the states. Guess what Beto; this constitutional amendment WILL NOT PASS! Second problem you have is gun control simply does not work. America’s top five cities with the highest murder rate, and very strict, failing gun control ordinances on the books are (In order of worst to least), Chicago, Detroit, Washington DC, St. Louis and New Orleans. Lawbreakers do not buy guns legally, so these local gun control laws only apply to law abiding citizens. The third serious problem you have is the constitutional provision for a well-armed militia. For 243 years, citizens have legally bought guns and ammunition. One of the constitutional reasons is in the event of a tyrannical government. Bottom line Bernie, Elizabeth and Beto, I would not suggest coming to Alabama as a pilot program of the government confiscating guns, not a great idea.
Every time we as Americans witness terrorist acts like senseless mass shootings, driving a van into a crowded sidewalk or see 757 jets flying into buildings, we grieve for the horrific loss of innocent human life. The loss of innocent life is always met by all of us with immeasurable emotions and often a panic stricken notion to do SOMETHING NOW! Remember cool heads and common sense must prevail, removing guns, knives, 757 jets and vans WILL NOT Stop illegal activity. We have laws on the books to handle lawbreakers, but our sentencing reforms have gone soft, the punishment does not match the crime. I wrote an article recently entitled, Reverse Recidivism Rate advocating restoring penalties to match crimes. Years ago, when we had an electric chair in Alabama (Yellow Mama), statistics noted that one execution would deter 17 future deaths. Yellow Mama was feared and served as a viable deterrent and before pulling the trigger, one would in a split second, fast forward to the horrors of facing Yellow Mama.
The same radical liberal folks pushing for gun control are also responsible for softening prison sentences, restoring felon’s rights, resist law enforcement officials from identifying potential terrorist and the mentally deranged by putting them on the highest level of threatcon delta status. They have also removed our most effective crime prevention tool, Yellow Mama. You can
always depend on liberal governing philosophies to pivot off to some side political advancement, like gun control rather than hit the problem head on. Have you noticed it is always somebody or something else at fault for the actions of these animals committing these fatal crimes against innocent people? In fact, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recent ranted we need to abolish prisons, how about them apples?
So before we fall for the temptation of removing guns, forks and spoons, pencils, 757 jets and vans; let’s tap the brakes, hit the reset button, reintroduce Yellow Mama, start sending these folks to meet Jesus, plow through political correctness and up our crime prevention game to threatcon delta status.